Posts Tagged ‘politics

01
Jul

CNN and a Revolution

It has been a while since I blogged about the book Irresistible Revolution by Shane Claiborne. Hindsight has helped me realize how formative that book was for me. It changed my thinking in a lot of ways. On Sunday night CNN ran a feature on Claiborne’s book tour for his latest book, Jesus for President. Normally a guy with a “radical” message, and someone who CNN calls a “misfit,” would not be recognized a leader of any type of change within Christianity. That is not the case with Shane. His message has been welcomed with open arms by young Christians.

I’ve spent a lot of time on this blog talking about independent politics, the issues of Christianity being polarized to one party, and many topics that within that arena. I’m sure many of you just think I’m being liberal or that I’m one of very few who thinks this way. I invite you read the article on CNN and watch this video by CNN too.

Then I invite you to seek out someone younger than you that cares about their faith in Christ and cares about the United States political process. I might not be the only one…

25
Jun

Dobson V. Obama: The Battle Begins

One of the top news stories of the past couple days has been Dobson’s attack on Barack Obama’s speech from 2 years ago. This whole thing has intriguiged me for 2 reasons:

  1. I would say a majority of young Christians either don’t know who Dobson is or they could careless about what he has to say. At the same time, many Christians value the opinions of Dobson greatly.
  2. Obama has a 50% chance of being the next President.

James Dobson and Barack ObamaThe news is that Dobson has accused Obama of dragging his confused theology into the political forefront. He also said that is he “dragging biblical understanding through the gutter.” Harsh words to say the least. In the speech, Obama was discussing how both liberal and conservative Christians can be a part of the political process without trying to mandate things illegal that they view as sin. The topic was and always will be a poignant one and I think Obama made a lot of great points.

Some great sources:

  • Here is a good, informative, ABC News video on the story.

  • “The clear purpose of the show was to attack Barack Obama. On the show, Dobson says of himself, ‘I’m not a reverend. I’m not a minister. I’m not a theologian. I’m not an evangelist. I’m a psychologist. I have a Ph.D. in child development.’”
  • Wallis said, “I have decided to respond to Dobson’s attacks. In most every case they are themselves clear distortions of what Obama said in that speech.”
  • “Dobson and his companion commentator routinely distorted what Obama was saying by rephrasing and capturing what he said in their own context and for their own agendas.”
  • “What they miss here is that Obama is talking about how to live in a pluralistic society.”

My thoughts:

  • Dobson’s criticism comes from a speech that Obama gave 2 years ago. It is one thing for a guy with no formal theological education to attack one man’s theology, but can’t we at least be current here. I’m not saying what Obama said 2 years ago shouldn’t count, but if he was truly upset about what Obama said then he should he said something earlier.
  • One area where I will give Dobson credit is that he has come out with questions and areas that give him pause for both McCain and Obama. I don’t think he is being one sided which is nice to see.
  • I don’t see how anything is accomplished here. Dobson has confused many Christians and put himself directly against the man who could be the leader of our country in 6 months.
  • I think this whole thing is petty. It is fine for Dobson to not support Obama, but to nit pick on the details of a speech from so long ago seems very pointless.

I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially those who agree with what Dobson said.

04
Jun

Who Would Have Thought?

Obama and McCain

If you told somebody 6 months ago that the race for becoming the next President would be against John McCain and Barack Obama, they would have thought you were crazy.

Well, it happened.

So how did we get here? Why is it these 2 men? What do you think?

My thoughts? I think both of them are politicians known for walking across the aisle to work with the other side. This has left both of them somewhat unwelcomed by their party. But I think that right now people want to see a politican who doesn’t stand on the party platform but that tries to make things happen.

27
May

We the Purple .4

Part One- Review

Part Two- Politics and the Internet

Part Three- The Old Guard of Conservative Christianity

Today we’re going to finish the series by getting into one of the biggest issues for Christian voters: abortion. I completely understand how sensitive this issues is and am welcome to dialoguing through the contact box and over email if comments are too public with this. I will do my very best to be sensitive to the various views on these issues. Please keep your comments uplifting to one another.

Conservative estimates say that 18% of evangelical women have abortions every year. I took my glasses off to read that twice. The information comes from the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform in Lake Forest, California.

Nancy Hird, of Moody Magazine says, “I think there is more pressure for Christians to abort than in secular society. In secular society there is not a lot of shame involved about sleeping with your boyfriend or in having a child out of wedlock.”

Let that sink in. Something is wrong with the picture Nancy presented. There is a strong disconnect. Somehow many Christians have not been able to teach their message in love. We are losing a generation of women because these women do not feel comfortable going to church because their sin is greater in many eyes, because they “killed a baby”. I can’t tell you how much it pains me that we throw arrows from the highest mountain top we have no business being on. And I’m not even saying Pro-Life is wrong, I’m simply saying that its never the stance that is rejected, it is the way the stance is presented. We, as believers, have done a very poor job of presenting our case in love.

Ford says, “Pro-choice women miss that sense of deep conviction when all they hear in the media is that the religious right wants to take away their right to decide what to do with their own bodies. Likewise, pro-life women miss the deep convictions of some pro-choice women about what they see as interference in their personal lives.”

As abortion and politics collide I think we see that partisanship obscures the problems faced by women, fathers who played no role in the choice, and medical workers.

What are some ways that we can bypass politics and still deal with abortion in a Godly way?

Marcia Ford’s blog

Buy the book

26
May

We the Purple .3

Part One- Review

Part Two- Politics and the Internet

Now we are getting into the controversy with Ford. She is bound to anger some of her readers as she dissects Christians and politics.

As she talks about conservative Christians and politics she says, “This attitude is evident ‘in the way political and religious conservatives vigorously and often angrily attempt to force their views and interests on everyone as if their interests, by definition, are God’s interests,’ writes Obery Hendricks in The Politics of Jesus. ‘This is not faith; it is arrogance.’” Anytime we, as Christians and believers in Christ, begin to say our interpretation to Scripture is inerrant, we always run into problems. I think this is where Republicans go wrong. They use the Bible to bring about political reform, as if their interpretation to the Bible is inerrant. I’m not saying we can’t think we are “most” right, but when we force this opinion on others it becomes an issue.

I think I mostly agree with everything in the quote above, but do I think it is important for our faith to play the key role in how we vote and interact with politics. So the question then becomes where do we draw the line? If our beliefs as Christians (as varied as they are) are different than our society, is it our job to change society? I think that is the question that I grapple with all the time.

Many Christians see this shift away from partisan politics in evangelicals as very recent. Ford makes some good points here:

  1. Lots of evangelicals stopped recognizing these men (Falwell, Dobson, Robertson) as leaders years ago.
  2. It’s not just young Christians who are disenchanted with the old guard. I’m really, really old (Ford said that, not me), and I’m less enchanted with the old guard than plenty of Christians half my age are.
  3. The shifts in evangelicalism (this is easily the most confusing word I have heard in a long time) have been underway for at least a decade.
  4. Serious evangelical discontent with partisan politics has been evident for at least 5 years. It didn’t just happen after Jerry Falwell died and Pat Robertson wanted to sniper attack a Latin American president.

I think the bigger problem with conservative Christianity’s “old guard” is that I never gave them the right to speak for me on what is the best decision to make on candidates or bills, yet most people outside of Christianity believe that all Christians think the way these leaders do.

23
May

We the Purple .2

Part One- Review of the book

I think the crux behind independent voters is that they believe there are more than two sides to most discussions, more than two voices that need to be heard, and more than two solutions to all problems.

The power of blogging and the internet has changed the way politicians campaign and win and lose elections. The internet has given independents a party of their own. It has given them a voice just as loud as the 2 traditional parties.

  • In the 2006 elections Jim Webb won over incumbent George Allen through a blogging campaign called “Draft Webb”, through a YouTube video with Allen having a “macaca” comment, and a video of Allen’s staffers taking out a Webb supporter.
  • 60 million people used the internet to look up information regarding the 2006 election.

What does this all mean? The internet provides a communication that is no longer from the mountain top on down. It empowers the powerless and has given redemption to many of the marginalized. More people are heard, and more people are able to speak to the world.

Obviously the internet and Web 2.0 (blogging, Facebook) has changed the way the world communicates and understands power and opinion. No longer do I only get information from the evening news or the morning newspaper…I get it all day long from friends and bloggers. And the it is the internet that has allowed independents to be the people who will elect the next President.

Has the internet changed how you deal with politics?

22
May

We the Purple .1

We The Purple Marcia Ford Independent Voters

When most people think of independent voters they think of people who are undecided, wavering, and unsure of what they believe. Marcia Ford’s book, We the Purple seeks to dispel this notion and to support and advocate for Christians being independent voters.

Despite being inclined to agree with Ford, I think she did an excellent job of viewing independent voters from both a Republican and Democrat side. And, she does not shy away from the key issues for many Christians and how she sees them as an independent voter.

I also love that she is just an everyday person with little to no ties to Washington or any lobbyist group. Ford is just one Christian woman who has decided to write a book on a political movement that makes sense for her. If you want to understand the changes in politics today…read the book.

I enjoyed the book enough to want to dive into some of the subjects that Ford brings up in her. It is not my goal to push her views or my thoughts so that you might agree with me or her. I would much prefer this be informative, conversation starting, and community building. My hope and prayer is that we can work through the difficulty that faith and politics is.

I first want to look at Ford’s introduction to independent voters.

  • Republicans and Democrats between 60% to 65% of US voters. That leaves 35% to 40% of voters as neither, which is essentially independent. It also makes independents as powerful or more powerful than either major US party.
  • Getting rid of partisanship leads to lively debates, more creative problem solving, freedom for candidates to speak their mind instead of conforming to party rules, and a vibrant field of candidates.

What are some of the key issues to independent voters:

  • Ballot access- If you are not a Republican or Democrat it is very difficult to get on the ballot and the difficulty is that the laws very immensely from state to state. In Georgia you need 200k signatures of registered voters to get on the ballot. They say it costs $1 a signature, and in Georgia no independent or minor party candidate has qualified to run for a congressional district since 1942.
  • Term Limits- Ever heard of a lifetime politician? Has anyone in their right mind ever tried to run against them? If we are going to impose term limits on the Presidency, then it would make sense to do so for other local and national offices.
  • Campaign Finance Reform- Ford really talks up John McCain here. He has been extremely influential within campaign finance reform. So for those of you who think Ford is really just a confused Democrat (what some call independents), I think she is pretty fond of McCain.
  • Redistricting- This is essentially the feud between Democrats and Republicans on how district lines should be drawn. They often trade back and forth between what they view as favorable lines.
  • What are Independents- Different states call independents on the ballot “unaffiliated” “no party” “I decline to state my party” “not a member of a party” “I do not wish to enroll in a party”
  • Primaries- Taxpayers pay for a primary, yet in some states it is impossible for an independent to vote in a primary.

Check out Marcia Ford’s blog and a blog she wrote specifically on this book.

Any of these resonate with you?

11
May

Big News

I’m in the news. Well kind of. A few weeks ago I spoke with a Seattle Times reporter who had read some of my blog. She wanted to talk to me about young Christians who are no longer voting Republican, and more about how faith and politics intersect. Her and I talked for around 40 minutes on the phone.

I got a text from a friend of mine this morning saying that he just saw my name in the Seattle Times. Sure enough, the article was on the front page of the Seattle Times and the main page of SeattleTimes.com. Pretty sweet. I was curious to see what she would put in the article from our conversation. Ben Climer, who went to my high school a few years after me, was also featured in the article. The article has been the most read on the Seattle Times website today, and has been showcased on a few political websites and blogs.

So what did I say? Well the article ends with this quote from me. “I just keep thinking, if Jesus were alive now, he wouldn’t necessarily be voting Republican.”

Before you read the rest of my post, go check out the article here. I’ll include the full text at the bottom of this post.

Now that you have read it…let me clear some things up.

  • While I did tell her that right now I am leaning towards voting Obama, I never said it had anything to do with Iraq. I did tell her that for me the war is one the lesser issues. I see valid reasons for staying or going.
  • I’m glad she included the part of me saying that I haven’t fully decided yet, because I haven’t.
  • Overall, I’m happy with the article and how I got included. I’m sure my grandparents are going to start wondering how the devil got to my brain, but I’m ok with that.
  • I haven’t shared my opinion on politics much on this blog. I guess that all changed with the article getting published.
  • It’s ridiculous that I’ll get labeled as “liberal” by many. Not ridiculous…sad.
  • Here is an example of where I do not want this conversation to go. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that many people are extremely passionate about politics and faith.

So what do you think?

Young, evangelical … for Obama?

By Haley Edwards

Michael Dudley is the son of a preacher man. He’s a born-again Christian with two family members in the military. He grew up in the Bible Belt, where almost everyone he knew was Republican. But this fall, he’s breaking a handful of stereotypes: He plans to vote for Democrat Barack Obama. “I think a lot of Christians are having trouble getting behind everything the Republicans stand for,” said Dudley, 20, a sophomore at Seattle Pacific University. Dudley’s disenchantment with the GOP isn’t unique among young, devoutly Christian voters. According to a September 2007 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, 15 percent of white evangelicals between 18 and 29, a group traditionally a shoo-in for the GOP, say they no longer identify with the Republican Party. Older evangelicals are also questioning their traditional allegiance, but not at the same rate.

But, Howard Dean, don’t count your chickens quite yet. College-age and 20-something Christians may be leaving the GOP, but only 5 percent of young evangelicals have joined the Democrats, according to the Pew survey. The other 10 percent are wandering the political wilderness, somewhere between “independent” and “unaffiliated.” Shane Claiborne, a Philadelphia Christian activist and author of “Jesus for President: Politics for Ordinary Radicals,” has a different name for these folks: “political misfits.” Claiborne has traveled around the country the past several years, speaking and preaching mostly to college-age Christians who are “both socially conservative and globally aware.” That makes them disenchanted with both major parties, he said. “It’s not about liberal or conservative, or Democrats or Republicans,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a new evangelical left. … There’s a new evangelical stuck-in-the-middle.”

advertising

UW communications professor David Domke said some young evangelicals are breaking with the GOP for the same reasons many people broke from the party in the 2006 legislative elections — the unpopular war in Iraq; the Bush administration’s abysmal approval ratings; or, now, because of the tanking economy. Others broke from the party when John McCain, who hasn’t held much appeal for evangelicals in the past, became the presumptive nominee. The Arizona senator hasn’t been a consistent foe of gay marriage, and he supports federally funded embryonic stem-cell research. James Dobson, head of the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family, announced in February that if McCain was the GOP nominee, he’d sit out the election. But students at a recent bipartisan political union meeting at SPU say there’s something more going on with young Christians than disenchantment with McCain. In an informal poll of the political union, the majority supported Obama.

“I think it’s a new movement starting,” said Amy Archibald, 19, a sophomore at the evangelical school. “Most of us would never blindly follow the old Christian Right anymore. James Dobson has nothing to do with us. A lot of us are taking apart the issues, and thinking, ‘OK, well, [none of the candidates] fits what I’m looking for exactly.’ But if you’re going to vote, you’ve got to take your pros with your cons.” Eugene Cho, a founder and lead pastor at Seattle’s Quest Church, which caters to a predominantly under-35 crowd, urges young Christians to look beyond the two or three issues that have allowed Christians to be “manipulated by those that know the game or use it as their sole agenda.” “While the issue of abortion — the sanctity of life — must always be a hugely important issue, we must juxtapose that with other issues that are also very important,” Cho wrote in his blog on faith and politics.

Polls have shown that young Christians aren’t any less concerned about the “family values” issues that have traditionally driven Christians to the Republican camp. (In fact, a study by the Barna Group, an evangelical polling organization, shows young Christians are actually more conservative on abortion than their elders.) It’s just that they’re also concerned about issues such as social justice and immigration, issues traditionally associated with Democrats. Judy Naegeli, 25, who works at a Christian philanthropy, says easy access to information about the world via social-networking sites, YouTube and blogs is the reason her generation is more concerned with social justice. “It’s changed our perspective. … Each generation chooses their cause, and ours is AIDs in Africa, or poverty or social justice,” she said.

Tyler Braun, 23, a Portland seminary student who opposes abortion and gay rights, said he’ll probably vote for Obama because he would like to see U.S. troops leave Iraq. Anika Smith, 23, who works for a think tank in Seattle, said she’s concerned with the same issues, but she plans to vote for McCain: “I’m worried about the war and the economy and social-justice issues. But, the abortion issue is still nonnegotiable.” Nathan Johnson, the executive director of the King County Republican Party, says he is skeptical that young, socially conservative Christians will desert the GOP this fall. He agrees young Christians appear to be looking beyond the two or three issues — abortion, gay rights, stem-cell research — that have made Christian voters loyal in the past. “But that doesn’t mean they’re no longer Republican. “Once the primary is over, and we get into a head-to-head contest, Obama’s voting record will come to light,” said Johnson, 24. “Then there will be a lot of young conservative voters who won’t be able to tolerate what he’s stood for in terms of abortion and other socially conservative values.”

Young evangelicals are more of a swing constituency than they’ve been for decades, said Andy Crouch, an editor at Christianity Today, a national evangelical magazine. “This could turn out to be the election where both parties realize that the evangelical vote is so hopelessly split down the middle that it’s not worth courting them at all because what parties need are blocs that can be appealed to en masse,” Crouch said. “Paradoxically, evangelicals would become less relevant than ever before.”

Braun, the seminary student, said he’s not totally committed to any candidate yet. “I just keep thinking, if Jesus were alive now, he wouldn’t necessarily be voting Republican,” he said.

22
Apr

Speaking of Faith: A Multi-Generational Discussion

Krista Tippett has moderated an event with Chuck Colson, Greg Boyd, and Shane Claiborne. It took place during the National Pastors Convention in February. All are key leaders for each of their generations. If you want to check out some info on each person head here. Audio for the event is also there. A video of it can be found here. It is about an hour long. Thanks to Debbie for pointing this out to me.

Essentially the discussion is about how/if Christians should be involved in politics.

It was only 30 years ago that almost every Christian stayed out of politics and we have seen in the last 30 years a total switch from that mindset. This change was something helped by Colson’s book Born Again. Boyd was a pastor who refused to support conservative politics from the pulpit. Shane is a leading voice for today’s postmodern generation.

Some of my thoughts on their discussion:

  • None of them question whether we must be involved in politics, what they questioned is how we are involved. They all resounded in unity on this subject.
  • Our job is to live out the kingdom of God; we need a more holistic view of what it means to be engaged in politics.
  • Shane made the distinction that Mother Theresa would never have worn a shirt that said “anti-abortion” but she would always say that “if you don’t want your baby, give it me.”
  • I totally agree with Shane when he says that Christianity gets extremely distorted when it gets into the hands of political power. The mix of the two creates confusion to many within Christianity and almost everyone outside of it.
  • Chuck Colson gets boxed into conservative Christianity but I think his willingness to agree with and converse with men like Shane shows he is a champion for conservative Christianity.
  • Boyd poses the question: When did the sin of homosexuality become so much more important to Christians than gossip? I pose that sexual sin has been stated in the Bible as a sin of the heart and should be taken very seriously. However, no sin is beyond grace and Christianity’s track record of treatment towards gays is poor at best.

Here is another blog on the same topic by Jonathan Brink.

25
Feb

Right or Left .3

You can check out the first two posts here and here.

I read two posts by Tony Jones on the God Politics blog run by Jim Wallis. It is fair to say that both of these guys are fairly liberal, although some would say they are really liberal. I think they both have a strong sense about being emergent and the political changes occurring within orthodox Christianity. Here are parts one and two of “Emergent Politics” by Tony Jones. I want to highlight some of things he has to say because they are spot on.

Problem #1 with emergents and politics: “Emergents don’t have a problem with Lockean individual rights per se - their problem is with the fact that unalienable, individual rights is not a biblical-theological virtue. The Bible’s call is not to protect the self but to sacrifice the self.”

Problem #2 with emergents and politics: “Emergents have grown up in the dire shadow of the Moral Majority and the Christian Coalition, who too closely allied with the Republicans in the 1980s and 1990s…many emergents have expressed to me great hesitation about the building momentum of leftward or progressive groups (such as Tikkun magazine, Sojourners/Call to Renewal, and FaithfulDemocrats.org). Their fear is that these groups will make the same mistakes that their conservative brethren did 30 years ago: lose their independence by aligning with a political party.”

Some thoughts of mine:

  • As much as emergents want to deny that they are politically liberal, they can’t win this argument. It is however, possible to be emerging or postmodern without this political stance. I just don’t see how Tony can say that emergents are avoiding a political side, because it is obvious that right now they are behind Obama and he is liberal. I’m not even saying that this is wrong, but it is certainly mere lip service to say they are avoiding left wing groups. They are a left wing group right now.
  • As I’ve felt myself moving to a more moderate stance within politics, I find myself more disheartened with the politics of the US. Our country is rooted deeply between two parties in which neither provide inherently Christian values. So what is the God blessing way to approach politics? Do we just not vote? Do we look past the things we disagree with? Do we try and figure out which things are “most important” and side with those? Doesn’t this just lead to a war of opinions?
  • I think the emergent desire to be involved with our culture is great, but I wonder where we draw the line or if we even draw a line.