Abortion in Politics

2008 October 13
by Tyler

As usual abortion is a hotly debated political issue among Christians, but also among non Christians. Hotly debated might be too kind, it is probably something beyond that. For many people this is THE issue, and rightfully so. I want to highlight something Tony Jones wrote a while ago. He came out many months ago in support of Obama, but has recently been a part of a panel (something like that) of pastors to lend insight to Obama’s team.

My biggest desire is that abortion wouldn’t be the elephant in the room that no one talks about. I see this time and time again, and it never helps show how Christians can be engaged with politics and yet loving at the same time. There are over a million abortions a year in the US alone and I would venture to say that many of those women think Christians hate them. I wish for Christians to be able to have conversations, rooted in love, that can look at both sides of this political issue while recognizing that abortion is much, much bigger than a just a political issue. Also, I’m not trying to lend support for or take a stand on one political candidate or the other. My point is that millions of Christians are going to vote for a candidate who supports pro-choice policies and yet Christians can rarely have a civil conversation about that.

Without trashing anybody in the process…I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Link to the post by Tony Jones HERE. He is describing a conference call between Obama’s team and this pastor panel.

“I think there were about eight pastorish people on the call, and three or four Obama staffers came and went.  For obvious reasons, I won’t disclose who was on the call, but I did notice something interesting.  I’d say that the group broke down as 5 older leaders, and 3 of us I’d call “youngish.”  I’ll refer to us as The Three and them as The Five.

The call began with some serious hand-wringing from The Five.  They were quite upset by the Palin Pick, and they strongly encouraged the O staffers to have BO go hard after her, exposing her lies and distortions about climate change, earmarks, etc.

The Three were almost completely unconcerned with Palin and suggested that O focus exclusively on McCain.

Then, the sparks started to fly.  One of The Three suggested that if O wants to peel off a segment of evangelicals under 40 who already share his concern for the environment, fighting poverty, and foreign diplomacy, that he must talk forthrightly about abortion. (Most of us will admit that O fumbled the ball at the Saddleback Forum when he told Rick that the decision about when life begins was above his pay grade.  He later admitted as much to George Stephanopolous.)

To this, The Five became quite upset.  They said that if O talks about abortion on the stump, he’s allowing the Religious Right to set the agenda.  One of The Three countered that, among his friends, abortion is the one thing holding younger evangelicals back from full-throated support of O.  One of O’s staffers said that O does very much want to reduce abortions, and he went on to say that abortions decreased during the Clinton administration and increased during W’s term.  The Republicans, quite simply, use abortion as a wedge issue during election years and then do NOTHING (yes, I’m shouting) to reduce abortions.

The Five continued to protest, saying that abortion is not an issue that O should deal with much.  To which I replied, “Do you want to win, or are you more interested in your principles?”

And this, it seems to me, is the most common stumbling block for progressives and liberals (I consider the former to be more centrist, and the latter to be more leftist).  Too often, they’ll stand on principle until it’s too late.

For my part, I encouraged BO to talk openly and candidly.  He thinks abortions are bad, and he wants to reduce them.  He doesn’t think that criminalizing doctors or mothers is the answer.  He thinks we need a more fully-orbed response to the problems of promiscuity and poverty that too often lead to abortions.

I think he needs to talk about this in Pennsylvania and Michigan and Florida and Ohio, and he needs to not look so uncomfortable when the subject comes up.  In fact, I really hope that BO is ready to address this issue head-on in the debates, because I think he can win over a lot of younger evangelicals who are currently on the fence.”

  • ACS

    Okay, I’ll post already.

    One:
    The biggest disappointment in politics is that WE, The PEOPLE, always get caught in the middle of most every political premise–most often in an election year, that is. When was the last time you received something in the mail or a phone call from an elected official asking your opinion and thoughts about a certain political whim that WASN’T during an election year? It seems to me, that most politicians “indulge” and “genuinely care” about their constituents when it seems convenient for them.

    Two:
    It makes my stomach turn that politicians use people as a “political wedge” in order to return a positive political outcome (winning the race). In reading the dialogue I sighed teh heaviest when the comment about …”The Republicans, quite simply, use abortion as a wedge issue during election years and then do NOTHING (yes, I’m shouting) to reduce abortions.” Although I agree with the author here, I don’t believe that it’s simply only a Republican phenomenon. I know Democrats and Independents are guilty of “human wedging” as well. In short, it’s easy to point at someone else, or a group of someones, and place blame which, in turn, makes one feel less guilty about using others. I have a quote on my office wall that says, “Use things. Not people.” I think most people have it wrong. Our society has turned from “WE, The People” to “Me, The Person.”

    Three:
    As far as abortion goes, to me this topic only gets the most attention every four years…as does same-sex rights, social security, health care and maybe education (education ironically, in my opinion, the most important entity that would eliminate many of them problems–is the one we put the least amount of time and effort into). Should issues of social justice and morality only be important every 4 years? Why are we so complacent and take three years off each year, and then rally back for year number 4? It hurts me that a group of pastors would be more concerned with winning than with caring. A Christain viewpoint should be one of humanitarianism, of caring first for the person and then for whatever may follow. I’m far from a theologian, but I think I remember an example or two about living out one’s life in that way in the Bible. Wouldn’t life eventually be a better place if Christian and non-Christian simply CARED FIRST? And why don’t we do that? We always seemed to get bogged down with the “what’s in it for me” thought, before we can roll up our own sleeve and reach out. It’s an issue of leading by example—which seems difficult when it’s the “unpopular” thing to do.

    It just goest to show how much politics and power infiltrate into every aspect of our lives. You’re kidding yourself if you think there’s no separation.

  • http://threebellchime.blogspot.com Ben

    I think it’s an interesting point that many younger voters would become full BO supporters if he talked openly about how he wants to decrease the numbers of abortions. Especially since the only thing that I have seen about O and abortion was a piece that slammed him. Honestly, what I really want to see is two guys talking for real at a debate and being genuine. No slamming. No pointing fingers. Just two guys who want to make America a better place. And I’d love to see them talk genuinely about the subject of abortion and what they truly think about it.

  • http://ash-nits.blogspot.com ash

    Ok, a woman’s response
    -as a believer in christ and someone who believes that we should err on the side of life- i do not support abortion.
    -BUT i cannot nor will not judge the women who go through it. pregnancy, esp an unplanned or even unwanted pregnancy is a heart breaking circumstance to face. this i know well!! and while i may no agree with the action, i cannot see how christians could be so bigoted and overwhelming political and harsh toward abortion. where is the compassion? how are they relaying love…? why are they judging the women who face this predicament w/o every knowing them or their situations? it saddens me deeply!
    -as far as voting is concerned…a recent politician, who i do not support, actually had the right answer for this: it should be on a state by state basis. i agree. just like homosexual marriages is a states decision, so should be the other SOCIAL elephant in the room…this should be the least of our worries in considering a candidate for office. all of them have at least noted that life begins at conception…and that’s a fine start, this should not be running politics for christians or otherwise

© 2009-2011 by Tyler Braun.   Powered by Wordpress.   Designed and coded by Paul Bae.